We are currently using Veritas NetBackup DataCentre v3.4.1 for our
Windows and HPUX platforms backup via a SAN architecture.
We are paying high monthly maintenance fees for the Veritas software and as such, we would like to evaluate the BrightStor Enterprise Backup solution as an alternative to Veritas? NetBackup DataCentre.
How do these two software solutions match up? Are we comparing apple with apples?
Requires Free Membership to View
When you register for SearchDataBackup.com, you’ll also receive targeted emails from my team of award-winning editorial writers. Because your job never seems to get any easier, it’s our goal to keep you up-to-date on the latest backup tips, trends and technologies that will help you get the job done.
Rich Castagna, Editorial Director
The high-level answer to your question would be yes, you are comparing apples to apples. Both NetBackup and BrightStor share a similar full plus incremental backup architecture. Both offer features such as backup to disk, LAN free and server free backups, tape device sharing, etc.
A word of caution if you ever plan on using Macintosh computers -- there is no EB support for the Mac OS. Another thing to consider when evaluating the product is the Bare Metal Restore option which is limited to Windows and Solaris, as well as hardware support. Also, there is a wide range of supported devices for BrightStor EB but I would make sure that your main hardware components -- tape and disk storage, SAN components, etc. -- are fully supported before making a decision.
Last but not least, consider the cost of training for new skills and revising or recreating automated backup processes imposed by a backup software change. These can quickly overshadow any licensing cost savings.
I hope this helps.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.
This was first published in March 2004