Do you see organizations using desktop virtualization to address the issue of unprotected data on laptops? Or is it too much of an expense or undertaking for most organizations?
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
The fact that desktop virtualization can simplify the backup process is simply an add-on benefit. It isn't usually enough of a compelling reason by itself to make an organization adopt the technology.
It is important to remember that desktop virtualization assumes that any time a user wants to access corporate resources, they log on to a virtual desktop. The problem with this assumption is that there are likely to be times when the user does not bother logging on and simply works locally. I have yet to see an organization provide mobile users with access to virtual desktops, but also perform laptop-specific backups. This means that data stored on the laptop's local hard drive may still be at risk in spite of the investment made in desktop virtualization.
Dig Deeper on Archiving and backup
Related Q&A from Brien Posey
Flash storage arrays consume less power than traditional disks, and could be used to significantly decrease an organization's backup window and ...continue reading
With the right planning, transitioning to Backup Exec 16 from an earlier version can be smooth sailing, preserving data directories and retaining ...continue reading
Copy data management can help an organization lower its costs by cutting back on extraneous copies of data, but the technology can cause performance ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.