Requires Free Membership to View
other disk-based data backup technologies, tape seems to be an increasingly outmoded technology. Analysts and journalists have been predicting the demise of tape for a long time now. Tape is still here, albeit there's less of it. According to the "Tape Library Outlook" from Freeman Reports, the market for tape libraries will continue to decline over the next several years. LTO tape is the only category the report sees as growing. However, the 2007 report also notes that the capacity of tape increased by nearly 50% as users moved to higher capacity tapes and libraries. Storage magazine's Purchasing Intentions survey shows similar results: Planned purchases of tape libraries are at an all time low and the libraries that users plan to buy are generally smaller than in previous years.
|  | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Generally speaking, the longer you want to keep data the more attractive tape becomes. The first two categories of stored backup data are increasingly the province of disk-based systems. In the third category, long-term storage, tape's advantages make it the most common choice. Traditionally, long-term storage accounted for only part of the backup market, so tape's overall share is shrinking as disks become more popular for file recovery and short-term and near-line storage. Tape also has several advantages when it comes to long-term storage and a few other jobs, such as mass data transfer.
The cost of tape
The biggest advantage tape has is its cost. Tape still has a lower cost per gigabyte of storage than any of its other competitors. While the cost of short-term disk storage, such as VTLs, has fallen to a level nearly equivalent to the cost of tape libraries, the libraries have a much greater storage capacity by swapping out tapes.
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a Station Wagon full of tapes. You can move your data from Point A to Point B over a WAN, or even the Internet, but when it comes to moving really large quantities of data where time isn't critical, tape is still the most cost-effective method.
Scalability
In theory, a tape drive or a tape library is infinitely scalable. All you have to do is buy more tapes. By contrast, disks typically require buying more hardware to get a major capacity increase. Adding disk arrays is expensive, not to mention the additional power and cooling costs, floor space requirements and other items.
Of course, this only works if you can swap out tapes, a restriction that seldom matters for long-term storage. If you need to keep the data constantly available in the tape library, tape's scalability is less of a factor.
Tapes consume less power
Disk drives have to run to be used. Except for MAID or arrays that can be turned off intermittently, disk storage is a major energy consumer in the data center, no matter how infrequently the data is needed. Tape drives only run when data is being read or written.
Legacy data
In many cases, tape survives simply because of the enormous amount of legacy data on tape. It's easier and cheaper just to keep using tape than it is to move to a new medium. Tape is also a thoroughly understood and well-supported technology. Nearly every kind of medium and long-term backup software supports tape and the tape interface is (relatively) easy to manage for that reason. That is also why VTLs are so popular. They provide a disk-based substitute for tape that plugs into existing architectures.
About the author: Rick Cook specializes in writing about issues related to storage and storage management.
This was first published in July 2008
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation