Problem solve Get help with specific problems with your technologies, process and projects.

Integrate a virtual tape library with real tape

Storage expert Rick Cook explains how hanging a tape drive or library off of a VTL and pruning your data are two ways to integrate your VTL with tape.

What you will learn from this tip: Storage expert Rick Cook explains how hanging a tape drive or library off of a VTL and pruning your data are two ways to integrate your VTL with tape.

Sooner or later you're almost certainly going to need tape. For archival storage, tape's combination of capacity, cost and storage life is hard to beat. That doesn't mean, however, that you're going to be backing up directly to tape. Increasingly, backups are going to disks, either in a disk array in a D2D configuration or to an array organized as a virtual tape library (VTL).

Related information

Pros and cons of converting to VTL

Three steps for evaluating a VTL product

Disaster recovery approaches for your VTL

So, how do you integrate a VTL with tape? The answer is, "it depends." First, it depends on the architecture of your system. Beyond that, it depends on the specific VTL and backup software you are using. Another factor is how much data pruning you do between backup and archival storage -- and how sophisticated it is. In general, the considerations involved in integrating a VTL with tape are conceptual and architectural rather than technical. VTL interfaces are highly standardized and are designed to appear as tape libraries or as disk arrays when exporting data.

The good news in all of this is that while you may still need tape, you don't need nearly as much of it. Not only is the volume of data written to tape much smaller with a VTL in the loop, but the architecture is much less complex (and expensive) and the time requirements are much more flexible. When writing from a VTL to archival tape, you are writing from one data source (the VTL) instead of multiple servers and with an extremely relaxed time frame. This means you also avoid the problems associated with multiplexing data streams from multiple servers into a single tape library.

One popular way to connect a VTL and tape is to hang the tape drive or library off of the VTL as direct-attached storage (DAS). This is cheap, simple and minimizes the load on the network. However, like all DAS, it is inflexible. If you think you may have to support additional VTLs you may want to use an alternate method, such as communicating with the tape unit over your SAN.

Data pruning is a consideration because you seldom need to archive everything you back up. Backups are designed to let you restore your files or system to a known state, almost always less than three months old and usually 30 days old or less. Archival data is data you need to store for the long term -- usually for years at a time and sometimes permanently. Typically, archival data will amount to much less than half of the data you back up.

So, how do you prune the data going from VTL to archival tape? The easiest way is simply not to save certain file extensions to tape. Unfortunately, this is seldom satisfactory, especially in the world of SOX and HIPAA requirements. That means you're going to need some 'storage smarts' in order to enforce business rules on what goes to tape, if you want to prune effectively. Some VTL products, such as those from FalconStor Software and Adaptec Inc., can handle policy-based replication of selected data to tape. Other approaches include having a separate server to handle your archival tape library or using the features of your backup software to monitor and prune the data feeding to tape.

Finally, keep in mind that although VTLs have been around for a while, it is still not a highly standardized technology. Consider VTL integration with tape carefully when choosing a VTL product and understand that not every vendor will offer all the features you want. Sometimes you can't get everything you want in one package.

Do you know…

How to prepare for next-generation backup?

Move your backups to a SAN

About the author: Rick Cook has been writing about mass storage since the days when the term meant an 80 K floppy disk. The computers he learned on used ferrite cores and magnetic drums. For the last 20 years, he has been a freelance writer specializing in storage and other computer issues.

Dig Deeper on Disk-based backup

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.